Study Shows "Feasibility" of Ending Specialist Follow-Up in Patients with Low-Risk CLL
Apr 04
2024
Three-Year Survival Similar in Patients Who Did or Did Not Continue Hematology Check-Ups
(WASHINGTON, April 4, 2024) – A study published in Blood Advances showed that among patients in Denmark who had slow-growing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with no symptoms and a low risk for ever needing treatment, those who stopped seeing their doctors for specialized follow-up had fewer hospital visits, fewer infections, and similar survival after three years compared to those who continued to undergo specialized follow-up.“To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study of what happens when specialist follow-up for CLL is stopped,” said Carsten Niemann, MD, PhD, chief physician in the department of hematology at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark, associate professor at the University of Copenhagen, and the study’s senior author. “Our findings show that it’s feasible to discontinue specialized follow-up in patients who have a very low risk of needing CLL treatment and that doing so does not cause these patients any harm.”
Eighty-four percent of the patients showed no signs of CLL progression and were not referred back to a hematology department within three years, Niemann said. Among the 16% of patients who developed signs of CLL progression and were referred for specialist care again, those who needed treatment received it in a timely fashion, he said.
CLL – the most common blood cancer in adults – can be aggressive, meaning it grows quickly, or indolent, meaning it grows very slowly. The average age at diagnosis is 70. While aggressive CLL needs immediate treatment, indolent CLL may remain stable for years without treatment. Studies have shown that up to three in 10 patients with CLL never need treatment. However, these patients often undergo years of specialized follow-up, or “watchful waiting,” including exams and blood tests that may cause them worry and psychological distress, researchers said.
In 2022, Niemann and his colleagues published a validated list of symptoms that identified more than 40% of patients with CLL whose yearly risk of needing treatment is less than two in 100. They conducted the current study to investigate the feasibility of ending specialist follow-up for these very low-risk patients.
The researchers retrieved data from a Danish blood cancer database for all patients diagnosed with, but never treated for, CLL at Rigshospitalet, a large academic medical center in Copenhagen. Patients whose CLL characteristics indicated a high or very high risk that they would eventually need treatment were excluded. Among the 200 eligible patients, the researchers selected 112 who were deemed through a review of their medical records to have a low risk of eventually needing treatment to be discontinued from specialized follow-up. These patients were advised to be vaccinated against pneumonia and influenza and to contact their primary care physicians if they developed fever, chills, night sweats, weight loss, or symptoms of infection. The other 88 patients continued their periodic follow-up visits, including physical exams and blood tests, with their hematologists.
The study’s primary endpoint was three-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints included hospital contacts, the time to developing a first infection, the duration of infections, the three-year rate of re-referral to a hematologist, and the time to needing the first treatment for CLL.
During the three-year follow-up period, the researchers tracked how patients were doing by reviewing their electronic medical records, which documented whether and for how long they were hospitalized, whether they received antibiotics or other medications, and so on.
At three years, overall survival was not significantly different for patients at similar risk levels regardless of whether they had continued or been discontinued from specialized follow-up care. Nineteen patients (16%) in the discontinued group were re-referred to hematologists. Of these, three chose to immediately discontinue follow-up care again and 12 to continue watchful waiting; four received CLL treatment. Fourteen patients in the discontinued group died during the follow-up period, compared with 19 patients in the group that continued specialist follow-up care. Causes of death included infections, other cancers, heart disease, stroke, trauma, and Alzheimer’s disease.
Among 2,811 hospital contacts in total, patients who ended and continued specialized follow-up had 873 (31%) and 1938 (69%) contacts, respectively.
Forty-five percent of the patients who discontinued follow-up care developed infections that were treated with antibiotics, compared with 51% of those who continued follow-up care.
“We have demonstrated that more than half of patients with low to intermediate risk for ever needing CLL treatment may safely be selected to stop specialized follow-up,” said Christian Brieghel, MD, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in hematology at Rigshospitalet and the study’s first author. “They had lower use of hospital and health care resources, a lower frequency of infections, and if they had an infection, they were hospitalized for a shorter time, and their overall survival was comparable to similar patients who continued specialized follow-up care.”
One limitation of the study was that it was not a randomized trial. Rather, the researchers selected patients who met specific low-risk criteria for ever needing CLL treatment to be discontinued from specialist follow-up. In addition, health care in Denmark is universal and free at the point of care; all patients who were discontinued from specialist follow-up were re-referred to a hematologist by their primary care physicians if they developed signs of CLL progression. The study findings might not be generalizable to countries with health care systems based primarily on private health insurance.
Blood Advances (bloodadvances.org) is an online, open access journal publishing more peer-reviewed hematology research than any other academic journal worldwide. Blood Advances is part of the Blood journals portfolio (bloodjournals.org) from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (hematology.org).
Contact:
Kira Sampson, American Society of Hematology
[email protected]; 202-499-1796
Help ASH Build an Inclusive Hematology Community!
ASH is committed to building and nurturing a global hematology community and workforce inclusive of diverse perspectives, talents, and experiences as it works toward one collective goal: helping hematologists conquer blood diseases worldwide.
How Can You Help?
Visit your My Account page, make needed updates to your demographic details, and select your preferred level of ASH access to your information; aggregated or individually identifiable, or choose not to provide or share your information. By sharing information about who you are, you will help ASH have a better appreciation of the diverse needs and talents present in the field, and help to build a more inclusive, collaborative hematology community. It will take only a few moments to complete!
Update Access to Demographic Information Learn About Our Mission