|
Hemo-Globins Continue to Fascinate and Surprise
Josef Prchal, MD
Dr. Prchal indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.
Roesner A, Hankeln T, Burmester T. Hypoxia induces a complex response
of globin expression in zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Exp Biol 2006;209:2129-37.
Fraser J, de Mello LV, Ward D, et al. Hypoxia-inducible myoglobin expression
in nonmuscle tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:2977-81.
There have been several important milestones in biology — the first protein
mutation to be discovered, the first elucidation of the crystal structure of
normal and mutant proteins, the discovery of restriction fragment-linked DNA
polymorphisms, the first prenatal diagnosis utilizing DNA sequence changes —
stemming from the work of experimental scientists fascinated with learning from
studies of human hemoglobins. After the existence of a closely functionally-
and structurally-related protein, myoglobin, became apparent, we might have
assumed that not much was left to be discovered. However, in 2000 Burmester
and colleagues reported in Nature1 that another globin with remarkable
homology to hemoglobin was present in neuronal tissues in mice and man. This
ancestrally older gene was thus coined "neuroglobin." Now, Roesner,
along with his colleagues at Burmester's laboratory, reports that the family
of globins present in vertebrates, flies, and zebrafish has grown and that some
are hypoxia-regulated. In zebrafish, there are at least six independent genes
of the globin family (see Figure 1) that have evolved from a single ancestor
that they shared approximately 700 million years ago. Since fish have developed
a remarkable adaptability to different oxygen tensions, the role of these genes
to hypoxia adaptation was investigated. In this paper, Roesner et al. report
that brain neuroglobin mRNA (but not retinal neuroglobin) was dramatically up-regulated
by hypoxia, while myoglobin expression was up-regulated to a lesser extent.
In the second paper, Fraser and colleagues analyzed hypoxic regulation in another
fish (the carp). They report widespread presence of myoglobins in unorthodox
tissues such as kidneys, brain, gills, etc., and their striking regulation by
hypoxia.

Since man is not a carp, do these elegant discoveries have
any meaning for humans? The functional details, such as oxygen-binding properties,
the presence or absence of Bohr effects on these diverse globins, their presence
in different tissues and different species2, and the subtleties of
hypoxia regulation, of these genes await elucidation. Nevertheless, there is
growing evidence that the newly discovered globins are also present in mammals
and found in unorthodox places such as rectal smooth muscle cells, prostate,
lungs, the brain, and endocrine organs3. Their role in oxygen delivery,
protection against nitric oxide, oxygen radical toxicity, adaptation to exercise,
and hypoxia is also becoming established2,3. One can also ask if
the yet-to-be-explained neurotoxicity and failure to thrive that is characteristic
of type 2 congenital methemoglobinemia4 may be caused by failure
to keep the heme iron in these globins in ferrous state by ubiquitous deficiency
of cytochrome b5 reductase. Clearly, we will soon learn more about the importance
of these newly discovered globins; hematologists will benefit from Dr. Thorsten
Burmester's upcoming lecture, Neuroglobin — Fresh Blood for the Globin
Family, at the Red Cell Scientific Committee session at this year's ASH
meeting.
- Burmester T, Weich B, Reinhardt S, et al. A vertebrate globin
expressed in the brain. Nature 2000;407:520-3.
- Hundahl C, Fago A, Dewilde S, et al. Oxygen binding properties of non- mammalian
nerve globins. FEBS J 2006;273:1323-9.
- Riggs AF, Gorr TA. A globin in every cell? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:2469-70.
- Prchal JT and Gregg XT. Red cell enzymopathies. Hematology: Basic Principles
and Practice, 4th ed. Hoffman R and Benz E (eds.), 2005.
Return to Top
Blood Platelets: Nature's Own Targeted Therapeutic Delivery System
Roy Silverstein, MD
Dr. Silverstein indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.
Lesurtel M, Graf R, Aleil B, et al. Platelet-derived serotonin mediates liver
regeneration. Science 2006;312:104-7.
The liver is one of the few adult tissues in mammals with the capacity for regeneration.
This paper reports a surprising role for platelets in this process. Using a
well-established mouse model to study liver regeneration after partial (70 percent)
hepatectomy, Lesurtel et al. found that hepatocyte proliferation was dramatically
diminished if the mice were rendered thrombocytopenic by either chemotherapy
or immune depletion. This effect could be duplicated in mice with normal platelet
counts by pharmacologic inhibition of platelet function with clopidogrel, a
drug that interferes with platelet secretion by blocking the P2Y12 ADP receptor.
Platelet-dependent promotion of hepatocyte regeneration was shown to result
from interaction of platelet-derived serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) with the
hepatocyte serotonin receptors 5-HT2A and 5-HT2B. Expression of these receptors
increased three-to four-fold after partial hepatectomy, and their specific pharmacologic
blockade produced the same effect as thrombocytopenia or clopidogrel. Furthermore,
treating thrombocytopenic mice with a specific 5HT agonist restored hepatocyte
proliferation after hepatectomy. The investigators also studied mice rendered
null for the tryptophan-hydroxylase-1 gene. These animals lack capacity to generate
peripheral 5HT and had a similar decrement in hepatocyte proliferation after
resection as did thrombocytopenic mice. This was reversed by injecting 5-hydroxytryptophan
to "re-load" platelets with 5HT.
Platelets play key roles in many aspects of vascular function
over and above their essential and well-characterized role in primary hemostasis.
An abundant literature has linked platelets to atherosclerosis, inflammation,
and reperfusion injury, and recent studies have pointed to platelet involvement
in angiogenesis. One of the more surprising and interesting characteristics
of platelets is the large number of biologically active molecules carried in
their granules — the molecules poised to be deposited at sites of vascular
injury as part of the platelet release reaction. Among the repertoire of platelet
α-granule constituents are peptide growth factors (e.g., PDGF and VEGF),
enzymes, enzyme inhibitors, and large multifunctional glycoproteins (e.g., thrombospondin
and vWF). In the dense granules are found bioactive nucleotides and amines such
as ADP and 5HT. Serotonin was first isolated from blood by Irvine Page (at Cleveland
Clinic) in 1948. Shortly thereafter, Marjorie Zucker and others found that nearly
all serotonin in blood was associated with platelets. Platelets take up 5HT
by an active transporter, and the platelet has been used as a model to study
5HT uptake, contributing greatly to our understanding of neurotransmission and
the development of drugs now commonly used to treat depression and other psychiatric
disorders. Serotonin functions both as a neurotransmitter and as a hormone,
acting through a family of related receptors that are expressed widely but differentially.
These regulate vascular tone, cardiac function, gut motility, airway reactivity,
and, as shown in this report, hepatocyte proliferation. Since patients receiving
liver transplantation often have portal hypertension, splenomegaly, and thrombocytopenia,
this work suggests that 5HT might be a useful adjunct to promote successful
transplant. These data also provide additional evidence for the concept that
platelets act as targeted delivery systems for endogenous regulatory molecules.
By adhering to the endothelium of injured organs and tissues and then secreting
their granular contents, platelets deposit high concentrations of highly-active
molecules in a regulated and localized manner. Unexpected roles for platelets
in many other biological systems are likely to be discovered.
Return to Top
Progress for Young Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Michael Williams, MD
Dr. Williams receives research funding from BiogenIDEC and
Genentech.
Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Osterborg A, et al. for the MabThera International
Trial (MInT) Group. CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy
alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a
randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group.
Lancet Oncol 2006;7:379-91.
Treatment of newly diagnosed DLBCL with the R-CHOP regimen (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide,
doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) is based upon French (GELA) and U.S.
Intergroup (ECOG 4494) trials demonstrating improved survival as compared with
CHOP alone in patients > 60 years of age. Although R-CHOP has been generally
adopted for treatment of younger patients as well, specific clinical study data
to support this approach has been lacking. Pfreundschuh et al. conducted a large
multinational randomized prospective trial in which patients age 16-60 with
low-risk DLBCL (age-adjusted IPI score of 0-1) received CHOP-like chemotherapy
(primarily CHOP or CHOP plus etoposide [CHOEP]), administered q21d with or without
concomitant rituximab. Radiation therapy 30-40 Gy was also administered to original
bulky sites of disease > 5 cm. As observed in elderly patients, the addition
of rituximab was associated with significantly improved event-free and overall
survival. Toxicities were similar in both groups. Somewhat surprisingly, prognostic
subgroups were identified even within this group selected as low-risk (Table).
Those with IPI 0 (i.e., limited stage), non-bulky disease had improved outcomes
versus those with bulky disease and/or IPI score of 1 (advanced stage, poor
performance status or high LDH).
DLBCL is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype in the western world,
and is both clinically and biologically heterogeneous. This important trial
confirms and extends earlier studies and establishes R-CHOP as a current standard
for younger as well as older patients with DLBCL. There was no clear benefit
to those who received R-CHOEP as compared with R-CHOP, suggesting to these authors
that rituximab has a "chemo-equalizing" effect or that the more intensive
and toxic CHOEP regimen impaired immune effector mechanisms important to rituximab
response. The identification of a highly favorable subgroup of very low-risk
patients (IPI 0, non-bulky) suggests that they should be treated and studied
in future clinical trials separately from DLBCL patients with greater degrees
of risk. The addition of rituximab to CHOP has provided an important but incremental
advance in DLBCL, and it remains essential to continue to build upon this progress.
To this end, current clinical research in previously untreated DLBCL includes
dose-modulated chemo-immunotherapy (e.g., dose-adjusted R-EPOCH or dose-dense
R-CHOP), R-CHOP followed by radioimmunotherapy consolidation, and risk stratification
for early stem cell transplantation based upon clinical IPI score, phenotypic
or molecular markers, and PET response after 2-3 cycles of induction chemotherapy.
Return to Top
Are We There Yet? Still Traveling on the Road to Correcting Hematopoietic
Cell Deficiencies with Gene Therapy
Lilli Petruzzelli, MD, PhD
Dr. Petruzzelli indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.
Ott MG, Schmidt M, Schwarzwaelder K, et al. Correction of X-linked chronic
granulomatous disease by gene therapy, augmented by insertional activation of
MDS1-EVI1, PRDM16 or SETBP1. Nat Med 2006;12:401-9.
Correction of underlying hematopoietic cell disorders can be achieved by two major
approaches, transplantation with HLA identical donors and genetic modification
of early hematopoietic precursors in order to overcome a defined defect. The side
effects of the former are well known, whereas the latter has its own set of difficulties
including poor engraftment, failure to sustain the clone, and, finally, risks
associated with integrating viruses that promote a growth advantage. In this manuscript,
the investigators targeted chronic granulomatous disease by gene transfer in two
patients. The underlying premise for this work was that this gene had no evidence
of growth-promoting advantage from animal studies but would reconstitute functional
NADPH oxidase activity. Their results have stirred the pot on both fronts.
gp91phox, in a retroviral vector containing a spleen-focus forming
virus LTR, was reconstituted into CD34+-mobilized peripheral blood cells from
two patients (P1 and P2) and then introduced into those patients who were conditioned
with liposomal busulfan. By day 80, peripheral blood was reconstituted with a
modest but detectable proportion of virally transduced cells that expressed gp91phox.
Integration preferentially occurred in gene coding regions and was skewed toward
transcription start sites. Over time, the insertion sites were not stable and
became less non-random, but still remained at multiple sites. After five months,
it was evident that insertion occurred at three common integration sites at or
near the genes encoding zinc finger proteins MDS1-EV11, PRD M1126, and SETBP1.
The latter was the least frequent and occurred only in P1. In circulating blood,
there was no elevation of total leukocytes or neutrophils. In P1, there was a
single clone that dominated with an insertion in MDS1-EV11, whereas in P2 there
was no single dominant clone. Transcripts of MDS1-EV11 and SETB11, but not PRDM16,
were overexpressed; however, growth-factor-dependent growth was maintained in
these clones. gp91phox expression was detected in circulating neutrophils
and expression correlated with activity. However, the level of superoxide production
was a fraction (1/3 to 1/7) of wild-type cells. Nonetheless, bacterial killing
appeared improved, and the rate of serious infections was markedly reduced, particularly
in P1 where the levels were higher.
Targeting a genetic defect in a defined cellular compartment
remains attractive, but recent data that implicate vector insertion with the
activation of an oncogene and leukemia have raised some concern about this approach.
The true power of this study is in the detailed analysis of the vector insertion
sites over time. Detailed and extensive analysis was done that demonstrated
that reconstitution was due to clones that had vector insertion into three discrete
genes which encode zinc-finger transcription factors. All of these genes have
been associated with translocations in patients with leukemia and raise a concern
about the long-term fate of the hematopoietic precursor cells in these patients.
At the time of the study, it is evident that the expression of the vector is
restricted to the myeloid compartment. It is clear that the insertion into these
sites has conferred a selection advantage on these clones with other insertion
sites disappearing with time. The major question that is raised from these findings
is whether the expression and control on expansion will remain a feature of
these cells with time. Expressing NADPH oxidase, even though not to the level
of wild type and not in all cells, benefits patients with this disease. It may
well be that the vector choice has made the difference in the insertion site.
The gradual restriction to such a discrete set of clonal insertion sites that
are genes associated with leukemia, and the growth of the select group of clones
raises concern that a small population of cells with a capacity for self renewal
may remain in the pack to repopulate with an immature population. The results
so far support that insertion into this site still leads to a restricted differentiated
population of cells that reconstitute a critical protein function. The data
presented continue to add to the questions of targeted gene therapy, but the
type of detailed analysis in this work may also be used to direct vector choices
and the cell population in which the gene is introduced.
Return to Top
Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Making the Best Choice?
Bob Löwenberg, MD, PhD
Dr. Löwenberg indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.
Lazarus HM, Perez WS, Klein JP, et al. Autotransplantation versus HLA-matched
unrelated donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective analysis
from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Br J Haematol
2006;132:755-69.
Autologous stem cell transplantation and allogeneic stem cell transplantation
(SCT) are established treatment options for patients with acute myeloid leukemia
(AML). There is a debate ongoing about the relative merits of each of these options
in first complete remission (CR1). What is the preferred treatment and for whom?
How does the choice of the SCT modality relate to the age and the considerable
variability of prognostic risk of different subsets of leukemia among patients?
Besides, in AML in CR2, treatment with autologous or allogeneic SCT appears to
offer the best opportunities of salvage to the patient. Quite frequently a matched
related sibling is not available to donate stem cells for an allogeneic transplant.
In those circumstances, autologous transplants or, more recently, unrelated donor
(URD) transplants offer alternative possibilities. The use of alternative donors
is relatively new. As of today, few studies have been undertaken to critically
evaluate URD transplantation.
The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research has reported
on a large retrospective study dealing with the comparative value of autologous
transplantation versus HLA-matched unrelated donor transplantation in AML. They
analyzed the data of 668 autotransplants and 476 URD transplants that had been
reported to their international registry. Autotransplants were associated with
better three-year survival than URD transplants. This was true both in CR1 and
CR2. The analysis reveals three-year adjusted survival rates of 57 percent (53-61)
after autotransplants and 44 percent (37-51; p=0.002) after URD transplants
for patients in CR1. Survival rates were 46 percent (39-53) and 33 percent (27-38;
p=0.006) for patients in CR2, respectively. In univariate analysis, the relapse
probability (at three years) was significantly reduced after URD transplantation
as compared to autotransplantation (13 percent versus 40 percent, relapse at
five years for CR1). However, the considerably higher treatment-related mortality
(51 percent versus 10 percent at five years) reversed the superior antileukemia
effect of URD transplantation. These trends were confirmed in multivariate analysis.
The investigators report a profound effect of age. Recipients of URD transplants
younger than 20 had not only a reduced risk of relapse but also a significantly
reduced risk of treatment-related mortality after transplantation.
The interesting point of this study is that it presents data
of a large series of cases collected from various institutions with a long follow-up.
There are obvious methodological limitations inherent to the retrospective design
of the study. First, as the study is not based on a prospective comparison between
autologous and alternative donor transplantations, it is quite likely that patients
with different risk profiles were selected for each of the treatments. Indeed,
the authors show that patients with unfavorable cytogenetics were more likely
to be offered URD transplantation. In addition, URD recipients were more likely
to have a reduced performance score and have leukemia with unfavorable cytogenetics,
and they had more difficulty (i.e., required more time) attaining CR1. These
adverse features of the URD patient group may have negatively influenced the
URD transplant results. Furthermore, in this study important cytogenetic information
was available only in a minority of cases. It would have been of clinical interest
to know about outcome in the distinct subsets of patients with high-risk AML
and intermediate prognostic risk. The numbers did not allow for such an analysis.
Finally, in recent years molecular HLA matching has improved considerably. The
degree of HLA match between unrelated donor-recipient pairs was insufficiently
defined in this study. Nowadays, high-resolution HLA typing allowing for better
donor selection appears to favorably affect the outcome of URD transplants.
What can we conclude? Both autologous and URD transplantation represent realistic
and clinically meaningful therapeutic options. As a next step, additional studies
involving (cyto)genetically characterized patient cohorts and using modern donor
selection methods are warranted in order to more fully define the comparative
values of autologous and URD transplantation modalities in patients with AML.
Return to Top
Is "Double Platelet Blockade" Twice as Good?
Charles Abrams, MD
Dr. Abrams indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.
Bhatt DL, Fox KA, Hacke W, et al.; CHARISMA Investigators. Clopidogrel and
aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N
Engl J Med 2006;354:1706-17.
In this paper, Bhatt et al. describe the findings of the Clopidogrel for High
Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance
(CHARISMA) trial. This study was designed to test the value of adding clopidogrel
to aspirin in patients who have multiple risk factors for atherothrombotic events.
Previous trials have demonstrated some value of dual platelet inhibition therapy
for patients with unstable angina, myocardial infarctions, and for patients
undergoing angioplasty.
The CHARISMA trial enrolled 15,603 patients with either documented cardiovascular
disease or multiple atherothrombotic risk factors. Patients were randomized
to receive low-dose aspirin along with either clopidogrel or placebo, and monitored
for an average of 28 months. Although there was a trend toward benefit, the
combined incidence of myocardial infarctions, strokes, and cardiovascular deaths
was not statistically significant between patients treated with combined modality
anti-platelet therapy and those treated with aspirin alone. Similarly, there
was a trend toward a higher incidence of severe bleeding in the double treatment
group, but again, this was not a statistically significant difference.

Like ticlopidine, clopidogrel is a member of a class of compounds called thienopyridines.
Metabolites of these drugs directly inhibit P2Y12, one of two types of ADP receptors
found on platelets. The CAPRIE study demonstrated that clopidogrel was at least
as good as aspirin in preventing cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events in
19,185 patients with known atherosclerosis1. Since aspirin and clopidogrel
poison platelets by different mechanisms (Figure 1), it is suggested that these
agents might have additive effects. In theory, this could be beneficial in the
treatment of diseases associated with platelet activation such as ischemic heart
disease, peripheral vascular disease, and ischemic strokes. This theory was
tested in the CURE trial that analyzed the outcome of 12,562 patients with the
acute coronary syndrome2. In this study, the addition of clopidogrel
to aspirin decreased the combined incidence of cardiovascular deaths, myocardial
infarctions, and strokes from 11.4 percent to 9.3 percent. The benefit of double
therapy was partially offset by an increase in severe bleeding from 2.7 percent
to 3.7 percent.
The findings of the CURE trial spawned a new series of trials investigating
whether double platelet blockade was better than single anti-platelet therapy
in a variety of patients at risk for arterial thrombi. Additional studies of
patients who had myocardial infarctions or angioplasty demonstrated and appeared
to confirm a benefit to double platelet blockade that outweighed the associated
bleeding risk. However, in the MATCH study, the bleeding complications of patients
who received dual anti-platelet therapy for the prevention of strokes offset
any benefit3.
The trial published by Bhatt and colleagues was designed to determine whether
long-term treatment with both clopidogrel and aspirin was better than aspirin
alone in a broad population at risk for cardiovascular events. As found in the
other trials, any benefit for double anti-platelet therapy was at best modest.
In total, there were 94 less ischemic events in patients treated with both clopidogrel
and aspirin, but at the expense of 93 more moderate or severe bleeding events.
Except in special circumstances such as angioplasty, it appears that the added
benefit of double anti-platelet therapy for most patients is small, and, at
times, dangerous.
- CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of
clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischemic events (CAPRIE).
Lancet 1996;348:1329-39.
- Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary
syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001;345:494-502.
- Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al.; MATCH investigators. Aspirin
and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent
ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH):
randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:331-7.
Return to Top
Homocysteine, B Vitamins, and Cardiovascular Disease: Lingering Questions
and Some Answers
Michael Linenberger, MD
Dr. Linenberger indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.
Lonn E, Yusuf S, Arnold MJ, et al. Homocysteine lowering with folic acid and
B vitamins in vascular disease. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1567-77.
Bønaa KH, Njølstad I, Ueland PM, et al. Homocysteine lowering
and cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1578-88.
Mild hyperhomocysteinemia occurs in roughly 5–7 percent of the general population
and is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, atherothrombosis, and venous
thromboembolism. Homocysteine can directly injure and dysregulate endothelial
cells, activate platelets and leukocytes, alter levels of coagulation and fibrinolytic
mediators, stimulate vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, oxidize LDL, and
disturb extracellular collagen and matrix formation. As a key intermediary in
the metabolism of methionine, folate, and cysteine (Figure), homocysteine is indirectly
involved in transmethylation reactions, DNA and RNA synthesis (via generation
of thymidine and purines), sulfate availability, and protein synthesis. Folic
acid, vitamin B12 (cobalamin), and vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) are important regulators
of these metabolic pathways (Figure), and low levels of these vitamins have been
implicated as independent risk factors for venous and arterial disease. Hyperhomocysteinemia
may result from deficiencies of these B vitamins, genetic defects involving remethylation
(especially N5,10- methylene-THF reductase) and transsulfuration (especially cystathionine
β-synthase), medical illnesses (especially renal failure and certain carcinomas),
and medications (especially folate antagonists). Supplementation with folic acid
and vitamin B12 can reduce normal or elevated homocysteine levels, and a number
of recent and ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the efficacy of B vitamins
in lowering homocysteine and preventing cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic
disease.
The primary prevention study reported by Lonn et al. (the Heart Outcomes Prevention
Evaluation [HOPE] 2 trial) observed no benefit of supplementation with vitamin
B12, folic acid, and vitamin B6 compared to placebo in reducing the incidence
of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke among
5522 patients followed for an average of five years. Similarly, the Norwegian
Vitamin [NORVIT] secondary prevention trial reported by Bønaa et al. found
no improvement in the risks of recurrent MI, stroke, and sudden death over a 40-month
median follow-up period among patients with a recent MI who received either vitamin
B12, folic acid, and vitamin B6 (n = 937), folic acid and B12 (n = 935), or B6
alone (n = 934), compared to placebo (n = 943). Combined vitamin supplements (but
not B6 alone) lowered the mean homocysteine levels by up to 20 percent in the
HOPE 2 trial (33 percent had baseline levels ≥12.7 µmol/L) and 27 percent
in the NORVIT study (40 percent had baseline levels >13 µmol/L). Of concern,
the NORVIT study observed a trend toward increased risk of the primary endpoint
among patients receiving any of the three vitamin supplement regimens (relative
risk, 1.22; 95 percent CI, 1.00 to 1.50; P = 0.05), and this correlated with a
baseline homocysteine level > 13 µmol/L.

The results of these two studies, together with primary observations of the Vitamin
Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) trial1, indicate that down-modulation
of homocysteine with B-vitamin supplementation does not protect against primary
or recurrent arterial vascular complications. By comparison, other recent data
suggest that certain vascular complications2 or patient subgroups3
may derive benefit from B vitamins. The trend toward worse outcomes in the NORVIT
study, along with observations of increased risk of in-stent restenosis among
vitamin-supplemented patients4, have spawned hypotheses that supraphysiologic
vitamin levels "shunt" homocysteine toward metabolic pathways that adversely
affect gene expression (via hypermethylation of DNA), protein synthesis, cell
proliferation, and/or methylation of atherogenic molecules. It is not yet known
whether these observations or mechanisms might be relevant to homocysteine modulation
with vitamin supplementation for the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease.
The current widespread use of dietary folate fortification and the relatively
modest associations between homocysteine, B vitamins, and vascular disease limit
the ability of these studies to assess a possible benefit or adverse effect of
vitamin supplementation. A meta-analysis of pooled data from the many current
clinical trials may offer important insights for clinical practice and public
health policy. Future prospective studies will need well-defined stratification
parameters, greater subject recruitment, and extended duration of treatment in
order to achieve adequate statistical power for subgroup analyses.
- Toole JF, Malinow MR, Chambless LE, et al. Lowering homocysteine
in patients with ischemic stroke to prevent recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction,
and death: the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:565-75.
- Schnyder G, Roffi M, Pin R, et al. Decreased rate of coronary resteno sis after
lowering of plasma homocysteine levels. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1593-600.
- Spence JD, Bang H, Chambless LE, et al. Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention
trial: an efficacy analysis. Stroke 2005;36:2404-9.
- Lange H, Suryapranata H, De Luca G, et al. Folate therapy and in stent restenosis
after coronary stenting. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2673-81.
Return to Top
Return to Table of Contents
|