helping hematologists conquer blood diseases
About ASH | Patients | Media | Make a Gift | Corporate Supporters
Home > Meetings > 2007 > Attendee >
  E-Mail This Page | Print This Page
MembershipMeetingsPublicationsEducation & CareersPolicy & PracticeASH Store


Find a Hematologist
Hematology Library

Blood
Image Bank
Education Program Book
ASH-SAP
Abstract Search
 
Annual Meeting

49th ASH® Annual Meeting and Exposition
December 8-11, 2007

Georgia World Congress Center
Atlanta, Georgia


Abstracts | Important Dates | Schedule At-a-Glance | Special Lectures | Special Interest Sessions | Education Program | Education Spotlight Sessions | Scientific Program | Meet-the-Expert Sessions | Oral and Poster Sessions | Trainee Activities and Services | ASH Business Meeting | Social Events | Exposition | Registration | Hotel Accommodations | CME Credits | Attendee Services | Travel | Atlanta | ASH Publications and Meeting Materials | Meeting Rules and Regulations | Speaker Preparation and Conflict of Interest | Friday Satellite Symposia


Special Interest Sessions

Training Program Directors Workshop/Business Meeting

Thursday, December 6, 2:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.

This annual workshop provides training program directors with the opportunity to learn from the experts and from each other. A plenary session on requirements from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and Residency Review Committee for Internal Medicine (RRC), as well as two mini-workshops on developing and maintaining fellow educational portfolios and program improvement tools and measures, will provide outstanding opportunities for training program directors to address the most pressing issues facing them and share best practices in critical areas. Additionally, program directors who complete this program will be eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™.

To facilitate the workshop, we are asking participants to provide us with examples of their “best practices” for fellow educational portfolios and program assessment tools and measures. Please e-mail your best practices to training@hematology.org. By sharing these different approaches for meeting ACGME and RRC requirements, we hope this session will help everyone achieve their individual educational and regulatory goals most effectively.

Similar to last year, we will conclude the workshop with a reception and a training program directors’ dinner during which the annual business meeting will be held. Dinner will be provided. Please note the date and the combination of the Training Program Directors Workshop and Business Meeting and make your travel plans accordingly.

Special Educational Symposium (New this year!)

Saturday, December 8, 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.

Presented by the ASH Committees on Government Affairs and Practice.

Title: Thrombosis in the Elderly: A Public Health and Scientific Problem of Unrecognized Dimensions
Chair: Roy L. Silverstein, MD, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
Speakers: Mary Cushman, MD, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
Epidemiology of Geriatric Venous Thromboembolism
  Charles Esmon, PhD, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK
Basic Mechanisms of Venous Thromboembolism Pathogenesis
  William Ershler, MD, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD
Venous Thrombosis and Accelerated Aging
  Kenneth A. Bauer, MD, VA Boston Healthcare System and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major and growing public health problem. Its incidence increases at an exponential rate beginning at about age 50, and among octogenarians the annual incidence approaches one in 100. VTE is likely the most common cause of preventable death in hospitalized patients. In the spring of 2006, ASH sponsored a workshop in Washington, DC, to identify and explore unanswered questions in this important area, and in the fall of 2006 the National Institutes of Health issued a request for applications (RFA) to encourage creative new research in the field.

Dr. Mary Cushman will address the significance and magnitude of the problem and review current knowledge of the epidemiology of venous thrombosis in the elderly, including published prospective studies in the field, such as Longitudinal Investigation of Thromboembolism Etiology (LITE) study, suggesting possible links to obesity and chronic inflammation. Available clinical databases will be discussed, as will existing outcomes data.

Dr. Charles Esmon will address existing gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology of venous thrombosis in the elderly. He will review current knowledge of age-related changes in platelet and endothelial cell function as well as in the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems – and discuss areas where further research is needed.

Dr. William Ershler will remind the audience that, although aging itself is not a disease, older people are more likely to have illnesses, and these illnesses are more likely to be chronic and debilitating. Geriatric medicine is a multidisciplinary field responsive to the special needs of older patients, and Dr. Ershler will discuss aspects of health-care delivery and health-services research specifically related to elderly populations. He will also remind the audience of the importance of maintaining independence and other functional endpoints when treating elderly patients for VTE and of the need to incorporate functional assessments into clinical studies.

Dr. Kenneth Bauer will address specific problems faced by clinicians when diagnosing, treating, offering prophylaxis, or designing clinical research for elderly patients. Among the issues to be discussed are age-related changes in D-dimer levels and their impact on diagnosis, choosing endpoints in clinical trials of deep vein thrombosis, special challenges related to warfarin use in the elderly, and the roles for inferior vena cava filters and thrombolytic therapy in the elderly.

Practice Forum

Saturday, December 8, 6:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.

Title: Evidence, Safety, and Clinical Decision Making: The Case of ESAs
Chair: Robert Weinstein, MD, Chair, ASH Committee on Practice, University of
Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA
Speakers: Jerry L. Spivak, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  Alan E. Lichtin, MD, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
 

Samuel M. Silver, MD, PhD, FACP, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

A major issue of interest this year among policy makers in the U.S. Congress, Food and Drug Administration, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the media, physicians, and patients has been appropriate use and coverage of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). The ASH Committee on Practice is sponsoring this forum to address this important issue for practicing hematologists. The program will feature presentations on the new Medicare coverage policy, the status of federal legislation regarding ESAs, the revised ASH practice guidelines on use of ESAs, and the impact of the new policy on practices. The program will also include a report about the Society’s practice-related advocacy efforts throughout the year and updates on legislation and regulation that will affect reimbursement for hematologists.

A special reception for practitioners will follow the program.

Promoting Minorities in Hematology Presentations and Reception

Saturday, December 8, 6:30 p.m. – 9:00 p.m.

ASH invites all interested meeting attendees to this event highlighting training and research opportunities for minorities underrepresented in hematology. The reception will include poster presentations by students participating in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Minority Research Supplement, a series of oral research presentations by the 2007 Minority Medical Student Award Program participants, and an announcement about the ASH-AMFDP award (a partnership between ASH and the Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation).

Representatives from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and National Institute on Aging will also be in attendance to provide information about their training and research offerings. The event will conclude with a buffet dinner and networking session.

Please join us to hear the impressive research presentations of program participants and to learn more about these exciting opportunities.

ASH Grassroots Network Breakfast

Sunday, December 9, 7:00 a.m. – 8:00 a.m.

During 2007, ASH launched several successful advocacy efforts focused on increasing funding for the National Institutes of Health, providing appropriate physician reimbursement, creating broader public awareness and support of hematologic diseases and disorders, developing performance measures for hematologists, and supporting stem cell research and genetic nondiscrimination legislation. The Grassroots Network Breakfast provides a forum for ASH staff to provide an update on major ASH legislative and regulatory efforts during 2007. All ASH members interested in becoming involved with the Society’s advocacy efforts are invited to come and learn about the legislative priorities for ASH’s 2008 advocacy agenda.

In addition, in recognition of those who have actively participated in ASH’s advocacy campaigns and efforts, the Society will present ASH Champion of Advocacy Awards to these dedicated members during this event.

Hematology Course Directors Meeting

Sunday, December 9, 7:00 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.

Join us for a breakfast meeting designed especially for second-year medical student hematology course directors. Speakers will discuss the latest tools and techniques available for teaching a second-year hematology course. We welcome you to share your experiences and exchange information on best practices for teaching hematology. If you are interested in making a presentation at this year’s meeting, please e-mail training@hematology.org.

Blood and Beyond: Searching the Scientific Literature Online

Sunday, December 9, 6:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.

The explosion of information on the Internet has led to powerful new search technologies to help make order out of chaos. Blood has partnered with Stanford University’s HighWire Press to provide robust search capabilities within Blood’s online journal site. This session will explore how to use the searching and alerting features in Blood Online, including RSS feeds and electronic table-of-contents (ETOC) alerts, to mine the scientific literature. Participants will also be introduced to new searching and automatic alerting features available from the HighWire portal, which allow powerful searching and browsing of hundreds of online journals, Medline, and other ASH publications hosted on the HighWire portal.

How to Prepare Images for Publication in Blood: Issues in Image Manipulation

Saturday, December 8, 6:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.

With the availability and increasing capabilities of image-processing software, authors are frequently unaware of acceptable versus unacceptable image manipulation in preparation of figures for scholarly journals. This session will provide examples to help authors prepare figures for publication, and review the process Blood uses to screen figures in papers accepted for publication to ensure that no inappropriate image editing has occurred.

Special Symposium on the Basic Science of Hemostasis and Thrombosis

This special session was designed to expand the opportunity for exchange and communication among basic scientists in the field of hemostasis and thrombosis. It will highlight the most important basic science contributions in 2007 in each of the three major areas of the field: (1) thrombosis, (2) blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, and (3) platelet biology.

In addition to the invited speakers listed, this special session will include a number of oral presentations selected from abstracts submitted to ASH for the annual meeting.

Tuesday, December 11, 1:30 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.

Co-Chairs: Paul Bray, MD, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
 

Eric F. Grabowski, MD, ScD, Harvard Medical School – Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

 

Nigel S. Key, MD, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Speakers:

Joel Moake, MD, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX
Introduction of the Recipient of the Mary Rodes Gibson Memorial Award in Hemostasis and Thrombosis (a trainee with the highest scoring abstract at the ASH annual meeting submitted in the field of hemostasis and thrombosis at the ASH annual meeting)

 

Benjamin T. Kile, PhD, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
An Intrinsic Cell Death Program Determines Platelet Life Span

Barring their consumption in hemostatic processes, platelets exhibit a circulating lifespan in humans of ~10 days. We have recently shown that the mechanism underlying this finite existence is an intrinsic cell death program. Platelets require the Bcl-2 family protein, Bcl-xL, for survival. Bcl-xL functions to restrain the activity of the pro-death regulators, Bak and Bax. Genetic deletion of the gene encoding Bcl-xL or pharmacological inhibition of the protein with the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 cause thrombocytopenia via dose-dependent reductions in platelet lifespan. Conversely, genetic deletion of Bak and Bax extends lifespan and renders platelets entirely refractory to the effects of ABT-737. Thus, the balance between pro-survival Bcl-xL and pro-death Bak and Bax maintains platelet viability; initiation of apoptosis circumscribes an individual platelet's existence. Attention is now focused on two major questions. The first of these is how the death program is regulated. Our current model is that the Bcl-xL:Bak pathway functions as a "molecular clock." In this scenario, the amount of Bcl-xL a platelet inherits determines its lifespan. In the absence of significant new protein synthesis, platelets are unable to counter an inexorable decline in Bcl-xL relative to Bak. Eventually, a threshold is reached, upon which pro-apoptotic Bak is freed and platelet apoptosis is induced. This is supported by evidence that Bcl-xL has a shorter half life than Bak and that ABT-737 preferentially targets older platelets (presumably containing less Bcl-xL). Current efforts are directed at testing the veracity of the model, and examining the possible existence of signals promoting platelet survival. The second major question is whether the Bcl-xL:Bak pathway is required for aspects of platelet function other than death. One possibility is that it operates as a discrete switch, dormant until triggered at the end of a platelet's useful life, and playing no other functional role. Alternatively, the pathway may be activated during hemostasis. Supporting this latter proposition are the plethora of platelet functional responses that resemble apoptosis. We are now untangling the role of Bak/Bax in these responses and evaluating the potential utility of Bak/Bax inhibition as a means to extend platelet life span and viability during storage prior to transfusion.

  Shahin Rafii, MD, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
Platelet-Mediated Recruitment of Bone Marrow-Derived VEGFR1+CXCR4+ Hemangiocytes in the Regulation of Neo-Vascularization

Bone-marrow-derived cells contribute to physiological and pathological vascular remodeling throughout ontogenesis and adult life. During tissue regeneration and tumor growth, hemangiogenic cells of hematopoietic and endothelial lineage are mobilized from the bone marrow and home to neo-angiogenic niches in the periphery, acting in synergy with mature hematopoietic cells, growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines. Plasma elevation of pro-angiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal-derived factor (SDF)-1α, and stem cell factor (Kit-ligand), induce mobilization of VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2)+ endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and VEGFR1+ CXCR4+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). At the neo-angiogenic niche, VEGFR1+CXCR4+ cells, or hemangiocytes, stabilize newly forming vessels, promoting the incorporation of VEGFR2-expressing EPCs. While VEGFR1+CXCR4+ cells provide peri-vascular support, platelets, as the primary storage and delivery vehicles for pro- and anti-angiogenic growth factors, including VEGF-A, angiostatin and thrombospondin (TSP), are also key contributors to new vessel growth. Site-specific deployment of stromal-derived factor (SDF)-1α by platelets may orchestrate the migration patterns of CXCR4+ hemangiogenic cells, directing the local angiogenic stimulus within an organ. Key factors, such as matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), enable the mobilization of hemangiogenic cells from the bone marrow and mediate the elaboration of SDF-1α from platelets. Moreover, current evidence implies that VEGFR1+CXCR4+ hemangiocytes and platelets contribute instructively and structurally to the vascularization of tumors and ischemic tissue recovery. These insights have profound clinical implications; inhibition of VEGFR1, CXCR4, and platelet-deployed SDF-1α may be an effective strategy to block the growth of hemangiogenic-dependent tumors, while the introduction of VEGFR1+ CXCR4+ hemangiocytes may accelerate revascularization and tissue regeneration.

Co-Authors: Isabelle Petit, PhD, Daniel Rafii, MD, PhD, and David Lyden, MD, PhD, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY

  Armin J. Reininger, MD, PhD, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
Primary and Secondary Hemostasis on Vessel Wall Components Under Shear Stress

Hemostasis is the orchestrated interplay of blood components to prevent blood loss in the case of vessel injury. Thrombosis represents the other side of the coin, a misrouted physiological process occurring on a diseased vessel wall. The hemodynamic process of axial migration, which occurs mainly at arterial shear rates, concentrates the bulk of red cells in the center of the blood vessel thereby leaving a red cell-free and platelet-rich boundary layer adjacent to the vessel wall. Platelets moving in that plasma layer constantly scan the endothelial surface for defects, which – when detected – are immediately sealed to close the leak. This process termed primary hemostasis can be divided into three phases. The first step is initial platelet arrest and adhesion: the platelets adhere to a thrombogenic surface, even from fast-flowing blood via the glycoprotein (GP) Ibα receptor, which requires no prior activation and binds to von Willebrand factor (VWF). Other proteins like fibronectin can substitute for VWF to a certain extent. Following outside-in and inside-out signalling, other receptors are activated, i.e., integrin αIIbβ3 (GPIIb/IIIa), integrin α2β1, GP VI, which then engage their respective ligands, namely VWF, fibrinogen, collagen, and other subendothelial matrix proteins. The second step is aggregation: again, flowing platelets first need to arrest via VWF bound to already adherent ones. Then, permanent adhesion is ensured by platelets sticking to each other through fibrinogen molecules bridging integrin αIIbβ3 receptors on adjacent platelets, respectively. When regular hemostasis is sealing a vessel leak, high shear rates reciprocal to the narrowing of the vessel occur. In order to assure sufficient platelet adhesion, even under such unfavorable flow conditions, an additional mechanism can be operative: reversible platelet aggregates form without prior activation mediated only by GPIb-VWF interaction at shear rates above 15,000 to 20,000 s-1.1 This mechanism would ensure the arrest of large numbers of platelets, which subsequently could be activated and incorporated into the growing thrombus. The third step is secretion: during activation the content of platelet granules is released by exocytosis, for example, VWF, fibrinogen, P-selectin, thrombospondin, fibronectin, and ADP. The latter additionally augment and propagate formation of a platelet aggregate exposing large amounts of procoagulant membranes, which accelerate clotting several thousand fold. The final hemostatic plug or thrombus develops by subsequent secondary hemostasis, i.e., the activation of the coagulation cascade and the generation of fibrin, which stabilizes the aggregate against shear stress. Platelet derived microparticles, which are also generated by GPIb-VWF interaction under high shear rates of 10,000 s-1 and above, exhibit an activated and procoagulant surface and shorten clotting time.2 Whether tissue factor plays its crucial role in secondary hemostasis in the blood-borne or the tissue-borne version is still under debate.

1. Ruggeri ZM, Orje JN, Habermann R, Federici AB, Reininger AJ. Activation-independent platelet adhesion and aggregation under elevated shear stress. Blood. 2006;108:1903-10. Epub June 13, 2006

2. Reininger AJ, Heijnen HF, Schumann H, Specht HM, Schramm W, Ruggeri ZM. Mechanism of platelet adhesion to von Willebrand factor and microparticle formation under high shear stress. Blood. 2006;107:3537-45. Epub January 31, 2006

  Roy L. Silverstein, MD, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
CD36: A Type B Scavenger Receptor That Modulates Platelet Function

CD36 (platelet glycoprotein IV) is an 88kd transmembrane protein expressed on platelets, megakaryocytes, phagocytic cells, adipocytes, myocytes, capillary endothelium, and specialized epithelia of gut, breast, and eye. On endothelial cells (EC), CD36 functions as a receptor for thrombospondins, mediating their antiangiogenic activity. On fat, muscle, and gut epithelium, it functions to facilitate fatty acid transport, while on phagocytic cells, it mediates recognition and uptake of modified (oxidized) phospholipids, apoptotic cells, and bacterial products. The function of CD36 on platelets has not been well studied. Recent work from our groups has shown that platelet CD36 binds oxidized LDL and specific oxidized phospholipids, and that this interaction led to platelet activation. Importantly, in vivo studies of murine thrombosis showed that CD36 deficiency mitigated the prothrombotic state observed in hyperlipidemic apoE null animals. Using biochemical and pharmacologic approaches, we have begun to define the signaling pathway by which CD36 influences platelet activation, showing a role for both src kinases and specific MAP kinases. Based on our earlier work showing that CD36 on phagocytic cells and endothelial cells can transmit cellular signals and that CD36 binds apoptotic cells via a specific interaction with phosphatidyl serine (PS) and/or oxidized PS, we hypothesized that platelet CD36 might interact with PS exposed on the surface of microparticles (MP) and thereby modulate platelet activation. We isolated MP from cultured human EC and showed by immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry that they bound to resting platelets. Using anti-CD36 monoclonal antibodies and platelets from CD36 null donors, we showed that this interaction was CD36-dependent. Platelet-MP interactions were blocked by treating MP with annexin V to mask exposed PS. Platelets incubated with MP at a 1:9 ratio showed augmented aggregation and activation in response to low doses of ADP. These data suggest a pathogenic link between platelet CD36 and prothrombotic disorders associated with circulating MP, such as inflammation, diabetes, and cancer. To study the role of CD36 in normal platelet function, we studied platelets from CD36 null mice and NakA- human subjects. Aggregation responses to low doses of agonists were blunted in CD36 null platelets, and both mesenteric and carotid thrombosis times in response to low levels of FeCl injury were prolonged in CD36 null mice. In summary, these data suggest a role for CD36 in modulating platelet function and in contributing to pathologic thrombosis in certain disease states.

Co-Authors: Kan Chen, MD, and Keith McCrae, MD, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Maria Febbraio, PhD, Wei Li, MD, PhD, and Eugene Podrez, MD, PhD, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and Arunima Ghosh, MD, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH

  Nigel Mackman, PhD, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Tissue Factor, Coagulation Proteases, and PARs in Coagulation and Inflammation

Tissue factor (TF) is the major cellular activator of the coagulation protease cascade. Under pathologic conditions, TF is expressed by vascular cells, such as monocytes and endothelial cells. TF expression by neutrophils and platelets is controversial. However, recent studies have shown that complement protein C5a induces TF expression in neutrophils. Moreover, platelets were found to contain stored TF pre-mRNA that after activation of the cells is spliced into mature message and translated. At present, the role of platelet TF in thrombosis is unknown. TF is also present in plasma in the form of microparticles, which are small membrane fragments released from activated or apoptotic cells. The contribution of different cell types to the pool of TF-positive microparticles may vary with different diseases. Nevertheless, TF expression within the vasculature is likely to play a major role in thrombosis associated with a variety of diseases, such as cancer, sickle cell disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, and sepsis. Activation of the clotting cascade generates various proteases, including FVIIa, FXa, and thrombin. Thrombin is required for formation of fibrin and activation of platelets. The proteases are also the target of new antithrombotic drugs. Coagulation proteases activate a family of protease-activated receptors (PARs). Thrombin activation of human platelets is mediated by PAR-1, a high affinity receptor, and PAR-4, a low affinity receptor. PAR-1 antagonists are currently in clinical trials for the treatment of thrombosis. Many diseases are associated with both coagulation and inflammation, suggesting that the two processes may be interconnected. Importantly, inhibition of coagulation reduces inflammation in animal models of sepsis. The activation of PARs by coagulation proteases may provide a link between coagulation and inflammation. In support of this notion, in vitro studies have shown that activation of PAR-1 and PAR-2 on endothelial cells induces the expression of inflammatory mediators, such as IL-6 and IL-8. Ongoing studies are analyzing the role of TF, coagulation proteases, and PARs in inflammation in different animal models. These studies may identify novel targets for anti-inflammatory therapy.

Special Session

Saturday, December 8, 4:00 p.m. - 5:30 p.m.

Title: Venous Thromboembolism: A Common Blood Clotting Disorder from Patient, Public Health, and Scientific Perspectives
Chair: Andrew I. Schafer, MD, President, American Society of Hematology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Panelists: Melanie Bloom, Coalition to Prevent Deep-Vein Thrombosis National Patient Spokesperson
  Tanja Popovic, MD, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
  Jeffrey Weitz, MD, Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  David Ginsburg, MD, University of Michigan Medical School, Life Sciences Institute, Ann Arbor, MI

The field of hematology has been historically at the forefront of clinical and basic research in thrombosis. Now, practicing hematologists are increasingly assuming a central position in the clinical diagnosis and management of patients with venous thromboembolism. It is, therefore, important and timely for clinicians and investigators alike to have an up-to-date and comprehensive command of all facets of the problem of venous thromboembolic disease.

This special program, the first of its kind at ASH, will assemble a group of leaders from a wide spectrum of perspectives to provide brief, topical overviews of venous thromboembolism as a focus of patient advocacy and public awareness, as a major public health problem, and as an area of exciting new developments in both clinical and basic research. All attendees of the annual meeting should find this special session enlightening.

Special Session on Practical and Ethical Issues Arising During the Conduct of Pharmaceutical-Industry-Sponsored Research

Saturday, December 8, 9:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.

Chair: Charles A. Schiffer, MD, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
Panelists: Francis Giles, MD, FRCPI, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Institute for Drug Development, Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, TX
  Richard L. Schilsky, MD, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
  David R. Parkinson, MD, Biogen Idec, San Diego, CA

The relationships between clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry have become increasingly complex with these interactions having significant impact on the type and quality of publications in the medical literature as well as presentations submitted to ASH and other meetings. For example, drug-company-sponsored trials have become a key, if not the largest, source of clinical research submissions to ASH and ASCO, particularly those focusing on new agents. In many circumstances, such presentations have represented the seminal work validating the use of some critically important compounds. Sometimes, however, it becomes difficult to distinguish science from marketing with repetitive updates of older data and less critical review of data by investigators before submission.

Pharmaceutical companies represent the major providers of interesting and innovative compounds and a significant source of funding for clinical research. Importantly, such trials also provide access to new treatments for the investigators’ patients. Therefore, it is critical that the relationships between sponsors and investigators be as communicative and efficient as possible.

Rather than a sequence of lectures, the panel will discuss a series of issues introduced by brief case presentations, some of which will include:

  1. Conflicts of Interest Inherent in Pharmaceutical-Industry-Sponsored Research
    These run the gamut from the potential effect on investigator objectivity because of a career-advancing association with positive studies, to issues posed by the plethora of dinner meetings and speakers bureaus, as well as issues posed by consultancies and stock ownership, insider information, and solicitations from investment advisors.

  2. Authorship and Publications
    An increasing fraction of articles describing the results of trials is now being written by either company employees or contract writers. It can be difficult to obtain access to the primary data, and it is unusual for investigators to be told about how the patients they treated have been scored in terms of response or toxicity.

    Many of the articles which derive from corporate-sponsored symposia have drafts prepared by scientific ghostwriters hired by the company. Their role is rarely acknowledged, and implications related to “credit” for academic promotion and potential bias are obvious.

  3. Problems Encountered During the Design and Conduct of Trials
    The excessive amount of data collection on industry trials creates major tensions between the institutional investigators, their data managers, and the outside CRO auditors. The process can be improved and made more efficient, and a dialogue about this and other practical issues related to the design and conduct of trials from both the investigators’ and companies’ perspectives will be presented.
Back to Annual Meeting Section

 

 

Contact Us   |  Terms of Service   |   Privacy Policy  |  Photo Credit   |   RSS

1900 M Street, NW, Suite 200    Washington, DC 20036    Phone: 202-776-0544    Fax: 202-776-0545    E-mail: ash@hematology.org

©2008 American Society of Hematology