By Pete Lollar, MD
2009-05-01
Dr. Lollar indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.
Jinnin M, Medici D, Park L, et al. Suppressed NFAT-dependent VEGFR1 expression and constitutive VEGFR2 signaling in infantile hemangioma. Nat Med. 2008;14:1236-46.
Infantile hemangiomas are the most common tumors of infancy. They
typically proliferate during the first year of life and involute during
the first decade. Hemangiomas are characterized by disorganized
vascular growth and the clonal proliferation of hemangioma endothelial
cells (hemECs). They may require therapeutic intervention if they are
large or compromise eating, breathing, or other functions.
Glucocorticoids are effective in some, but not all, cases.
 |
Jinnin, et al., from Bjorn Olsen’s lab at Harvard, compared cultured
hemECs from nine infantile hemangioma patients to cultured human dermal
microvascular endothelial cells (HDMECs) from normal individuals. They
found that expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1
(VEGFR1) in hemECs was decreased compared to HDMECs. VEGFR1 is a decoy
receptor that competes for binding of VEGF to VEGFR2. The resulting low
VEGFR1 expression in hemECs results in increased VEGFR2 expression (see
Figure). Activation of downstream VEGFR2 signaling pathways results in
increased expression of VEGF, the glucose transporter GLUT-1, and
several phosphorylated proteins, including phospho-ERK and phospho-Akt.
Constitutive VEGFR2 signaling in hemECs was decreased by soluble VEGFR1
or antibodies that neutralize VEGF or stimulate β1 integrin.
The authors identified a putative promoter for the transcription
factor, nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), in the gene
encoding VEGFR1 (FLT1) and found that transcription of FLT1 in HDMECs was NFAT-dependent. The expression of NFAT and several of its target genes, including FLT1
and the gene for cycloxygenase-2 (PTSG2), was decreased in hemECs. NFAT
is a known target of VEGFR2 signaling in endothelial cells. Because
VEGFR2 signaling is up-regulated in hemECs, the finding of decreased
NFAT activity was unexpected.
Further investigation using the clue that NFAT activation and
integrin signaling are both Ca2+-dependent led to the identification of
β1 integrin as an NFAT activator. Immunoprecipitation experiments
revealed that the integrin-like receptor tumor endothelial marker-8
(TEM8), VEGFR2, and β1 integrin form a complex on the surface of HDMECs
and hemECs. Sequencing of 24 candidate genes led to the identification
of missense mutations in genes encoding VEGFR2 (KDR) or TEM8 (ANTXR1,
the anthrax receptor) in three of the nine patients. Experiments
involving heterologous expression of wild-type and mutant genes in
hemECs and HDMECs, respectively, revealed an increased interaction
between VEGFR2, TEM8, and β1 integrin in hemECs. However, in hemECs, β1
integrin is present in an inactive state, apparently accounting for the
anomalous decrease in activated NFAT.
The study by Jinnin, et al. is important because it
provides a mechanistic model that describes the development of
hemangiomas. The central feature of the model is imbalanced expression
between the decoy receptor, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 and their interrelated
signaling pathways (see Figure). The model accounts for previously
described molecular changes in hemangiomas, such as increased
expression of GLUT1, which has been used to differentiate hemangiomas
from other vascular lesions. Further analysis of the VEGFR1 and VEGFR2
pathways may reveal additional insights into the pathophysiology of the
growth and involution of hemangiomas. Also, additional genetic
abnormalities that contribute to the development of hemangiomas may be
discovered. The finding that VEGFR1/VEGFR2 balance can be modified by
extracellular ligands suggests a novel therapeutic approach to the
treatment of hemangiomas. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody that is
approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic cancer, is a
potential candidate.
back to top