Patients and Politics: Interpreting the Footprints of Donkeys and Elephants for Patients

By Margaret Ragni, MD, MPH

Dr. Ragni is Professor of Medicine in the Division of Hematology/Oncology at the University of Pittsburgh and Director of the Hemophilia Center of Western Pennsylvania. She is also a member of the medical/scientific advisory committee at the National Hemophilia Foundation.

Editor's Note: This is the second in a series of articles illustrating how hematologists can become involved with the presidential election. ASH members are encouraged to take advantage of and create new opportunities to become involved in the election and particularly to share their views about health-related issues with the candidates. The first article, "Grassroots Advocacy Visible From 30,000 Feet," appeared in the March/April edition of The Hematologist.

Do election politics leave you cold? Have political pundits got you down? Have you grown tired of the political bickering? One possible solution has been offered by Vice President for Public Policy Glenn Mones at the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF). Mr. Mones is developing something refreshing and relevant. He is creating a patient-focused guide about the upcoming presidential election and its potential impact on health care in general and on individuals with bleeding or clotting disorders in particular. Dr. Craig Kessler, of Georgetown University, and chair of NHF's Medical and Scientific Advisory Committee (MASAC), asked Mr. Mones to give a short presentation on the subject at their recent meeting in Chicago. Dr. Kessler mentioned that he had received a lot of positive feedback on the presentation; thus, the idea of the patient guide came about. Mr. Mones' analysis is not intended to be an endorsement of any candidate, but rather a look at where the candidates stand on key health-care issues and how their proposals might affect individuals with bleeding and clotting disorders.

As Mr. Mones describes, "This is a campaign: We are hearing what the candidates are saying but not necessarily whether they will carry through on their promises, nor whether their policies will work. None of the plans are detailed enough to determine how well they would meet the particular needs of the bleeding and clotting disorders community."

While Mr. Mones' guide does not attempt to solve your patients' health-care issues, his effort highlights how one can make this presidential campaign more relevant to the hematology community. Interested readers can obtain the guide by contacting the National Hemophilia Foundation at 800-42-HANDI. The chart to the right displays a few examples from the guide. ASH has also prepared a side-by-side comparison of the presidential candidates' positions on health care.

back to top