By John P. Leonard, MD, and Tracy Roades
2008-01-01
Dr. Leonard is the Richard T. Silver Distinguished Professor of
Hematology and Medical Oncology, Director of Hematology/Oncology
Clinical Research Program, and Professor of Medicine at Weill Cornell
Medical College.
Ms. Roades is the Research Advocacy Manager at ASH.
Last spring, CMS initiated several rounds of proposed revisions to
the rules governing Medicare coverage of services provided to
beneficiaries enrolled in clinical research studies.
Under the Medicare Clinical Trial Policy, first developed in
September 2000, Medicare will pay for certain items and services for
Medicare beneficiaries involved in clinical trials. In April, CMS
issued proposed revisions to this policy. Some of these had the
potential to impact the ability of patients to participate in clinical
trials, and therefore could have affected clinical trial accrual and
operations in significant ways. ASH submitted comments expressing
concern with a number of the proposed revisions.
In commenting on CMS's proposed revisions to its coverage policy,
ASH sought to ensure that Medicare beneficiaries are not, in any way,
discouraged from participating in clinical trials. ASH's comments to
CMS took into account comments and input from the Reimbursement
Subcommittee, the Committee on Government Affairs, and the general ASH
membership. These comments detailed concerns about proposed new
requirements for publication of research study information, the
generalization of studies to the Medicare population, and
self-certification and deeming (to verify that studies meet certain
qualifying criteria). In some of these areas, individual investigators
and institutions potentially would have been held responsible for
ensuring that new and higher standards were met to ensure that Medicare
beneficiaries could participate in trials. Some of these were not fully
defined or were beyond the scope of expected conduct of clinical
research practice, and therefore had the potential to hinder activities
in a significant way.
As a result of the comments submitted by ASH and other organizations
during the agency's first reconsideration of the policy, CMS announced
in a July 9 Decision Memorandum that it was backing away from the
proposed changes and indicated that the agency was "issuing this
national coverage determination in order to preserve the status quo
with the exception of two changes" — clarifying that items or services
under investigation in a clinical trial will be covered by Medicare if
they would be otherwise covered outside of a clinical trial and adding
language indicating that Medicare could cover routine costs in
connection with clinical trials required as a result of a National
Coverage Decision (NCD) based on a Coverage with Evidence Development
(CED) determination.
However, after issuing the Decision Memorandum, CMS reopened the
Clinical Trial Policy for a second reconsideration. ASH once again
submitted comments on the proposed revisions and again focused on
concerns about proposed new requirements for public release of research
study information and self-certification requirements. In mid-October,
CMS announced that the final policy would maintain the revisions
contained in the July 9 final Decision Memorandum on the policy but
negate all of the other proposed changes to the Clinical Trial Policy.
The fact that CMS has, in the end, not made major modifications to
how it handles participation for Medicare beneficiaries seems to be
good news for ASH members, in that clinical research in hematology and
hematologic malignancies should be able to continue without new hurdles
to overcome. However, CMS has indicated that it may again reopen the
Clinical Trial Policy for another reconsideration in the future and
that the agency may still issue one or more proposed rules to modify
Medicare regulations pertaining to coverage and payment in connection
with clinical trials. ASH members should be alert to updates from the
ASH leadership in this area. It is clearly important to both the
clinical and research missions of hematologists that clinical research
efforts are facilitated rather than hindered and that Medicare
beneficiaries have the opportunity to participate in clinical trials
both now and in the future.
back to top