Xylina T. Gregg, MD, and Josef T. Prchal, MD
2008-11-01
Drs. Gregg and Prchal indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.
Bargou R, Leo E, Zugmaier G, et al. Tumor regression in cancer patients by very low doses of a T-cell-engaging antibody. Science. 2008;321:974-7.
 |
It has been decades since immunotherapy of tumors was proposed, but
the initial excitement was rapidly dampened by failure to find
tumor-specific antigens as these potential targets were shared with
normal tissues. Furthermore, administration of antibodies against these
antigens has been frequently followed by antigen modulation resulting
in rapid refractoriness of the tumor and the need for a relatively
large concentration of antibodies. While cell-mediated immunotherapy
based on in vitro expansion of antigen-trained T cells and
dendritic cells have been more promising for EBV-initiated tumors such
as certain lymphomas and Hodgkin lymphoma, this laborious and expensive
approach has been limited to a few specialized centers, and clinical
studies of other therapies designed to elicit a T-cell response, such
as vaccination and anti-CTCL4 therapy, have thus far been disappointing.
 |
T cells lack an Fcγ receptor and thus cannot be recruited or activated by conventional antibodies. Bispecific T-cell Engagers
(BiTE) are a novel construct of single-chain bispecific antibody-like
molecules with one end having specificity for a tumor-expressing
antigen and the other for a T-cell antigen. As shown in the Figure, a
BiTE antibody tethers T cells to a target cell determined by its
tumor-expressing antigen specificity, and this direct engagement
elicits cytotoxicity. Blinatumomab is a BiTE antibody that has dual
specificity for the T-cell CD3 antigen and the universal B-cell antigen
CD19. Bargou and coworkers from Germany describe the first human trial
of a BiTE antibody. The authors treated 38 patients with various B-cell
non-Hodgkin lymphomas at increasing dose levels of blinatumomab in this
phase I/II study. The majority of patients had follicular lymphoma (41
percent) or mantle cell lymphoma (38 percent). All had received prior
therapy, with a median of three prior therapies (range 1 to 12).
Eighty-seven percent had received rituximab. Blinatumomab was
administered as a continuous intravenous infusion over four to eight
weeks at dose levels of 0.0005 to 0.06 mg/m2. There were four complete and seven partial responses, all of which occurred at doses of 0.015 mg/m2 or higher. All seven patients treated at the highest dose level (0.06 mg/m2)
responded. The majority of tumor regression occurred during the first
four weeks of therapy. The longest duration of CR was 13+ months in a
patient with mantle cell lymphoma and three additional patients had
responses lasting longer than six months. The most common toxicities
were fever, chills, lympho- and leukopenia, and increased C reactive
protein levels. These side effects were most common in the first week
of treatment. Eight patients discontinued therapy due to adverse
events. Five of the eight had central nervous system events, including
confusion, cerebellar symptoms, and seizures, but all symptoms were
reversed with discontinuation of therapy. CD19 positive cells rapidly
vanished from the peripheral blood and remained undetectable during
therapy. Peripheral T-cell numbers also initially vanished but then
returned to baseline and in some patients were increased.
 |
This report by Bargou, et al. may radically change
the applicability and efficacy of cell-mediated immunotherapy of
cancer. The BiTE antibody approach bypasses many of the mechanisms
cancer cells use to evade cytotoxic T cells. Binding to CD3 activates
cytotoxic T cells and effectively recruits additional T cells to tumor
tissue. In addition, the cell kill is limited to the cells with the
target antigen. Thus, low levels of BiTE antibody should be effective,
and indeed the amount of blinatumomab associated with response in this
trial was an amazing 5-log-fold lower than the amount of rituximab
required for response. Additional work in a larger number of patients
will be required to ascertain the response rate and duration of
response. In addition, potential toxicities of this therapy will need
to be better defined; for example, the drastic decline of B cells would
be expected to lead to the usual complications of immunosuppression. A
more convenient schedule of administration would also be desirable.
However, this is indeed a very promising new therapy, and BiTE
antibodies to other antigens, including CD33 and CEA, are already in
the process of development.
back to top