By Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, MS
2009-12-07
Please note the following correction in the second sentence of the third paragraph: " ... those whose tumors lack expression of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and HER2 ... " In the original article, "or" was used.
|
The Beatles recorded the
song “Come Together” 40 years ago at the request of Timothy Leary (1920-1996),
who was running a dark-horse campaign for Governor of California against Ronald
Reagan and whose campaign slogan was, “Come together, join the party.” Leary is
best known as the psychologist who experimented with LSD as a way of promoting
social interaction and raising consciousness. For those of us “leery” of
illicit drugs and their consequences, luckily we have the annual ASH/ASCO Joint
Symposium to satisfy our need to interact with our colleagues who treat
patients with solid tumors and to raise consciousness of important advances in
clinical medical oncology.
The first presentation
in this year’s ASH/ASCO symposium was by Dr. Eunice Kwak of the Massachusetts
General Hospital in Boston, who described a phase I dose escalation trial of
PF-02341066, an oral c-Met (mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor) and ALK
(anaplastic lymphoma kinase) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients
with a variety of advanced cancers. c-Met encodes hepatocyte growth factor and
is deregulated in a broad range of tumors, including cancers of the kidney,
liver, stomach, breast, and brain; ALK is a fusion partner with nucleophosmin
(NPM) in the t(2;5) typical of anaplastic large-cell lymphomas. Among the 37
patients enrolled in the dose-escalation part of Dr. Kwak’s study,
dose-limiting toxicities included hepatotoxicity and fatigue, with the most
common side effects being gastrointestinal and fatigue. Among 50 patients with
ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer who were enrolled in the expanded phase II
portion of the study, the overall response rate was 64 percent.
Dr. Joyce O’Shaughnessy
of Baylor University
in Dallas next
explored the efficacy of BSI-201, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1)
inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin in patients with
metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in a phase II trial. Patients
with TNBC — i.e., those whose tumors lack expression of estrogen receptors,
progesterone receptors, and HER2 — have a particularly aggressive cancer that,
like BRCA1-related breast cancers, is sensitive in vitro to inhibition
of the cell proliferation and DNA repair enzyme PARP1. In the study described
by Dr. O’Shaughnessy, 123 patients with TNBC were randomized to receive gemcitabine and carboplatin with or without BSI-201, and the two
study arms were compared with respect to clinical benefit rate (CBR),
progression-free survival, and overall survival. The investigators found that
of 86 evaluable patients, those randomized to the arm including BSI-201 did
better with respect to all outcomes, with more than a doubling of CBR and
overall response rate, and significantly improved overall survival.
The other three
presentations in the joint symposium focused on hematologic malignancies. Dr.
Hugo Fernandez of the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa presented results of the
E1900 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study of dose-intense daunorubicin (90
mg/m2) compared to standard dose (45 mg/m2) for younger adults with acute
myeloid leukemia and declared that the higher dose should now be considered
standard of care. Dr. Christian Gisselbrecht of Paris, France, discussed the
results of the CORAL study of 396 patients with relapsed or primary refractory
CD20-expressing diffuse large-cell lymphoma; the R-ICE and R-DHAP “salvage”
regimens performed comparably, though R-ICE was associated with fewer adverse
events. Finally, Dr. Sundar Jagannath of St. Vincent’s Medical Center in New
York City discussed carfilzomib, a novel protesome inhibitor with activity in
multiple myeloma patients resistant to bortezomib and other agents.
With these novel drugs
and drug combinations, perhaps, as John Lennon wrote, “one and one and one is
three” when it comes to future response rate possibilities in oncology.
Dr. Sekeres indicated no relevant conflicts of
interest.
back to top